log idle. MAP and BARO should read the same. It's a start.
N2BRK Well-known member Dec 31, 2009 2,391 727 113 Today at 1:52 PM #21 log idle. MAP and BARO should read the same. It's a start.
darkness Well-known member Jul 15, 2009 1,569 597 113 49 vegas Today at 2:38 PM #22 N2BRK said: log idle. MAP and BARO should read the same. It's a start. Click to expand... They read the same.
N2BRK said: log idle. MAP and BARO should read the same. It's a start. Click to expand... They read the same.
M Mikey52 Active member Sep 20, 2018 172 43 28 Today at 3:44 PM #23 KOEO THE MAP SHOULD BE CLOSE TO 14.7 but needs to be corrected to altitude above msl, boost should be zero.
KOEO THE MAP SHOULD BE CLOSE TO 14.7 but needs to be corrected to altitude above msl, boost should be zero.
N2BRK Well-known member Dec 31, 2009 2,391 727 113 Today at 3:53 PM #24 Ok. What about location. If you have a boost leak, and the sensors are far apart, could we get this discrepancy under load? Boost leak test next?
Ok. What about location. If you have a boost leak, and the sensors are far apart, could we get this discrepancy under load? Boost leak test next?
