Word
If you gain efficiency why would it not gain power?
But that's where the turbo's ability to work efficiently in a broader rpm range comes into the equation too right Caleb? Part of the debate is about the meaning of performance to us. Since the general consensus is that performance is not just defined by dyno numbers but instead by the overall ability of the truck to do work (ie move itself through 1320ft at X speed), the peak data values become just as important as the values at say, 2000 rpm and 5 psi of boost.
Power across the curve is absolutely more important than just a peak number. We will always willingly give up a few HP for a broader, more useable, and accessable, power curve. That is another great example as to why a dyno can be a useful tool. If all test parameters are the same, then we can look at output vs RPM. Sampling at any RPM we can click on.
Like Brayden has mentioned, we don't race maps or dynos. What Borg says we should be running isn't always right, or could just be better. Street manners for instance, are not measured on a compressor map. And even tho something shows a gain or loss at an RPM on the dyno, it doesn't always mean its noticed on the street. Point is, we wouldn't put the time and effort into making something better, if we didn't feel it could be better. :thumb:
Caleb
Well the new little guy showed up today, gotta ship it up to Vegas to get put on among some other stuff, excited to see how it runs.
I would run the 87mm turbine wheel regardless.